Beta
Mixing integer types - Part 2
Loading description...
Language Features
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
The markdown link toward the part 1 kata is badly formatted.
Resolved!
Ok. Since the kata has been retired it's prolly better to remove the mention in description too, though.
No random tests.
Can the sum in
add_mixed_narrowingoverflowu32? It's not specified.Nice catch! My intention was that
Noneshould be returned if any overflow were to occur.I'll update the description to specify this, and add test cases for
add_mixed_narrowing()andadd_mixed_signs()to test this case.Edit: Kata has been updated.