Draft
Crop the Image
Loading description...
Image Processing
NumPy
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
The kata does not make sense on making user code guess the threshold. There is no way to "guess" a threshold that is 100% correct, which is what the kata is asking us to do; what we're doing at best is coming up with flimsy heuristics that will pass the kata's tests, but will fail against many real-world examples (e.g with high ISO there will be a lot of noises, so a lot of bright dots; they might even be brighter than the object of interest), and if you make the test cases too tight, then it approaches the territory of "guessing the heuristics reference solution uses", which is equally undesirable.
Error messages are useless.
You can use something like
Thank you! This is definitely a better way to format the error messages.