7 kyu
When we are equal, we are identical
306Chris_Rands
Loading description...
Strings
Fundamentals
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
I understand the concept of equality and identify. Can someone please explain, with what the input provided to the function should be compared. Or any other input that can help to understand the ask in this Kata. Appreciate the input.
I read the documentation and was able to solve the Kata. Thanks to the authtor for putting a great kata.
Why the rating of this Kata is so low? It is pretty good and requires solid knowledge about Python types. I want to thank the author of this magnificent kata!
I had to do research for this. Even knowing the concept, the solution was hard to find.
As the Kata author, to reply to several comments. I suggested 6 kyu for this Kata based on the concept, but when it was approved the rating was set at 7 kyu by the approver. I cannot edit the rank. Follow-up with the approver or a moderator if you wish
the codewars smartasses strike again
Although I really like this Kata, its not that simple. The solution looks simple but the required knowledge to get to it is not 7 kyu.
This comment has been hidden.
This is not a basic concept...
This comment has been hidden.
What would you suggest? I recomended 6ku, which is also the Average Assessed Rank
This comment has been hidden.
as jimpjorps mentioned, this is very hard to properly classify. What I can say without a doubt though is that this is not a white kata. The underlying language feature this kata relies on is something someone programming in Python (or other languages) for a decade might never know about, and it wouldn't make a difference in their day-to-day job. It certainly isn't something a novice should/will be aware of. Anyway, the point is moot as you can't rerank a kata once it's approved. I just fear it might demoralize some newer users who expect something that's at least researchable, but without knowing about the technical term for what's going on here, there's very little hope of success.
Tests should explicitly import the solution and testing framework.
Is that correct now?
New test framework should be used.
I don't understand why this is failing in the new testing framework?
Traceback:
I it because of the SyntaxWarning raised? How to do this? Thanks
Have you read the documentation? There's a very clear example available there.
Done thanks!