7 kyu
Resolving the Goldbach conjecture! (Part 1)
47b-mehta
Loading description...
Puzzles
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
This is a trivial point, but is there a mistake in the statement? We are assuming that n is even, and then multiplying by 2.
Upgraded Lean to 3.39.1 (removed
import data.nat.primefrom Preloaded because ambiguous otherwise)Approved
Do I need to merge this change into the kata or is it resolved?
Approving the fork already merges.
The line
in
Preloadedcauses a simpleunfold goldbach/rw goldbachto fail. How might one work around this?This comment has been hidden.
Amended, thanks.