Retired
Adding Logs (retired)
Loading description...
Fundamentals
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
I think power users should not be so hasty to downvote a kata if it's still fixable in beta (give the author some days to fix it). After all, that's what beta is for, to test and improve a kata. With opened issues it isn't approvable, so that's enough in my opinion to not let it in the wild with bugs or not enough quality.
This comment has been hidden.
Little typo in description
emample
should beexample
.thanks
Never directly compare two floating numbers or the kata would become
guess what calculation the author is using
because this will occurYou should use
Test.assertApproxEquals(actual, expected[, msg])
or implement your own approx equal assertion function if 1E-9 difference is not enough.thanks
Needs Random Tests.
I have added a random test, thanks for the help.