Beta
Total Resistance in a Parallel Circuit
76AseelM
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Algorithms
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
If you create a fork of a solution, it fails the tests even if the solution is not modified.
And it's still a duplicate.
The formula is missing, you could provide a link if you don't want to provide it in the instructions.
@AseelM,
Good job on authoring this Kata - it is apparent that you have put in a fair amount of effort into this Kata following the feedback received from your previous one and I have to say that I am impressed by the quality of this Kata considering this is only the third to fourth week since you've touched your first line of code :D
Unfortunately, as @Unnamed mentioned, this topic has been covered by 2 other Kata here on Codewars. In order to further improve this Kata and get it out of Beta, I would suggest that you add a "spin" to this Kata, such as including type checking and error handling etc. Otherwise, this Kata is perfect with full code coverage (i.e. fixed assertions, edge cases and random tests) and a clear Description.
Looking forward to your improvements on this Kata - and don't stop authoring high-quality Kata :D
Cheers, donaldsebleung
Thank you so very much... I highly appreciate the encouragement and the support! I will look into your suggestions on how to improve this Kata, and in the future search for an idea on CW thoroughly before publishing ones, to avoid the duplicate trap! thanks so very much again, and I look forward to the continued support and feedback!
This comment has been hidden.
thanks for the feedback :)
@ZozoFouchtra @AseelM the example test should be fixed now :)
Duplicate: https://www.codewars.com/kata/parallel-resistors
Thanks :) I will be more thorough with my research on CW next time :)