6 kyu
Shortest code: Father and Son
222myjinxin2015
Loading description...
Puzzles
Games
Restricted
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Node 12 should be enabled (Refer this and this for more info)
Description formatting is broken
HOW CAN SON HAVE MANY FATHER??? YOU EXPLAIN TO ME
A little hard for me to limit the code in 120 :<
I'm sorry, but I think it can not be an issue, because length limit is a rule of my 'shortest code' series, I write "This is the challenge version of coding 3min series. If you feel difficult, please complete the simple version" in the kata's description(first line), so you can try it with simple version.
I'm getting
okfailed test again. All other tests pass.Perhaps excessive prevent cheating is not necessary I will remove the test items wait a moment..
can you try it now?
Thanks! It works.
it's only the expects error test.
This comment has been hidden.
yes, I'm find another way to detect this do you know how to catch the text of the solution edit block?
yes, but it's dodgy because it can be broken by
'strict'This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.